Throughout education, it is recognised as important for all
students to have equal opportunity in all possible ways. We attempt to achieve this by making sure
that all students are treated equally and not discriminated against,
particularly in issues of race. However,
though the concept of sexism and discrimination against women seems almost
outdated after the feminist achievements of the century and the long way that
we’ve come, the gender gap in terms of both education and the workforce is
still an issue today.
Just recently (October 25th 2013), Australia was
ranked 24th on the latest gender gap index by the World Economic
Forum. In a recent article onnews.com.au, Sarah Millar notes that ‘Women in countries including South
Africa, Cuba, Burundi, the Philippines, Latvia and Lesotho all enjoy greater
equality with men than Australia.’
Gender inequality has been a sad fact over social history
and affects women at all walks of life – and in terms of Australian education,
things are no different. Though women
may be seen as experiencing the same education as men, there are noted gender
differences in educational outcomes. Dee (2006) focuses on the differences
between student/teacher interactions as a possible part of root reasons why
this gender gap exists in education.
Dee notes ‘Recent discussions of gender interactions within classrooms
have centred on controversial claims that teachers consistently privilege boys
over girls (for example, with more positive feedback and helpful questions’. It may be hard to recall far back enough into
one’s primary education to remember having witnessed this type of behaviour and
favouritism, and harder still from an individual’s perspective to be able to
judge whether this type of behaviour was singular to the specific, sexist
teacher or whether it is based on a larger trend – large enough to have such a
profound effect on the gender gap in achievement in education.
Dee’s second point, however, is perhaps more easy to relate
to one’s own schooling and identify as a trend from personal experience. Do
student outcomes differ when students and teachers share the same gender?
From
my own experience, I know that I have found it much easier to relate to certain
teachers, often if they share my gender and might offer more relatable points
of view. However (at least in secondary
school) it seems hard to place such a large emphasis on different outcomes due
to this relationship (though possible in subjects such as English or History,
it would be harder to be marked in favour in more straight fact-based subjects
like Maths or Science), and unless this difference in achievement was based on
a more personal tutoring relationship with the teacher in which the student
felt more comfortable asking their own-gendered teacher for help, bias to such
a large extent does seem difficult to carry over all areas of achievement.
Also to be considered is the amount of female teachers
within schools. Teaching in the current time is seen as a female-appropriate
career, and there are often more female teachers in a school than males. If same-gendered favouritism has a large
impact on students outcomes, female students (particularly in primary schools)
should be getting ahead, rather than behind, forming this gender gap.
It is difficult to tell the exact root causes of the gender
gap in achievement, particularly in terms of education and what might have led
to the gender gap as seen in the workforce and Australian society – however,
what is clear is that further education on the topic is necessary and Australia
should be looking at countries further up the scale on the gender gap index to
try and emulate them and create genuine equal opportunity in terms of gender
for all.
References:
Millar, S. ‘Australia ranked 24th on latest gender gap index
by World Economic Forum’ News.com.au, October 25, 2013 [accessed online at http://www.news.com.au/national/australia-ranked-24th-on-latest-gender-gap-index-by-world-economic-forum/story-fncynjr2-1226746874528]
Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student
achievement.Journal of Human Resources, 42(3),
528-554.
No comments:
Post a Comment