Culture plays a critical part in education systems, especially
as they are the gateway in which all children learn the world around them. However,
the education system teaches students a particular type of culture: in our case Down Under, the so-called typical
Australian culture and identity.
Crikey.
Apple (1996:14) calls hegemonic culture. It is the cultural
identity that is dominant within a society and pervades and overrides all other
cultural identities. It isn’t coercive. But it’s on top of the school
popularity ladder.
Students in Australia are taught an Anglo-American, highly
Western, form of education that inclines them to behave and understand the
world through certain Western ideologies and agendas. This is particularly
evident in the ways in which Indigenous history and circumstances are
sidelined, if not marginalised, insofar that it is not taught parallel to the
rest of the curriculum.
In fact, I remember at school Indigenous history was not
really priority, even when having to endure the cumbersome White Anglo centric
approach to British colonisation.
Colonisation.
Not invasion.
I was educated in a curriculum that romanticised the British
arrival.
Don’t blame me.
Students are taught to realign themselves with typical white
Australian beliefs and ideology. Other cultures don’t necessary become secondary. They
become homogenised and a general understanding of their cultural identity
prevails.
This is evident in “What type of Asian Are You?” – a YouTube
video that highlights how cultural identities can be homogenised through basic
superficial understandings such as stereotypes.
For those that didn't watch.... The video simply outlines how Asian culture and identity has
been homogenised by the American, but what I think it does also, is effectively
highlight how White Anglo culture (in this case American) reflects upon itself
as being the normative standard; the American looks upon his identity as one
that is not crafted, but the principle identity in which others are
differentiated from.
The Australian curriculum does the same through its
Eurocentric values and beliefs. It has little regard to Indigenous culture and
identity (Andersen
and Walter, 2010:71). I argue that the Indigenous identity is always under
scrutiny as the lens in which we identify them through is clouded with White
Eurocentric prejudice.
Marginalisation of Indigenous history not only reinforces White
dominance as their voice is further suppressed under Australian hegemonic
culture; but also reinforces their secondary cultural status within popular national
Australian identity.
Lastly, continual ineffective policy changes do not support the
necessary role and importance that is required of Indigenous history in our
educational context, and only continues to limit Indigenous identity and
culture.
Andersen C. and Walter, M. (2010), “Indigenous Perspectives
and Cultural Identity” in Hyde, M., Carpenter, L. and Conway, R. (eds.), Diversity and Inclusion in Australian
Schools, Oxford: Australia and New Zealand
Apple, M.W. (1996), Cultural
Politics and Education, Teachers College Press: New York
helpmefindparents, (May
23, 2013), What Kind of Asian are you?
Accessed Monday 23/09/2013 at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWynJkN5HbQ>
No comments:
Post a Comment